There is some fascinating work out recently in the
October Journal of Consumer Research by psychologists Kimberlee Weaver, Stephen
Garcia, and Norbert Schwarz in which they illustrate something they call the
“Presenter’s Paradox”. What they’ve discovered, through a series of documented studies,
is that the final perception formed by someone on the receiving end of a
presentation tends to be an AVERAGE of the information rather than an additive
approach to the individual components (which would lead to a higher valuation).
What does that mean? Well, basically it’s clinical proof
of the old adage “less is more”. In many ways it seems irrational, but also head-slappingly
obvious. Rankings of value go down when products are “bundled” to look more
costly, or gift with purchase is offered, or a job candidate continues to
rattle off excessive qualifications. It seems that offering more would be
perceived as valuable, but because the receiver is unconsciously averaging the
high value item (say an iPod) with the low value item (like a free song) they
reach a final impression of lower total value.
Ronnie has always known this intuitively, and we’ve had a
few…discussions…over the years about what and how much we are showing to a
client. She has NO qualms about culling the old or weak designs from a
portfolio and shelving any piece, even new work, that doesn’t measure up. One
might assume that if a client is looking for a snowman, then the more snowmen
you show them the better chance you have. Not so. What happens is people tend
to automatically average out what they are shown in the pitch or presentation,
so if you show them three great pieces, the “great” impression remains. If you
show them three great pieces, 4 OK pieces and maybe a couple not so good pieces
– they are left with the perception that everything was just OK, and you have significantly
lessened the impact of your best work.
So what can you do? First, consider the showing of your
portfolio to be a singular event, not a collection of individual pieces. If you
are including items that are not your best work , realize that they are dragging the
client’s perception of your best work down to a lower level. Say you assign a 1
to 10 ranking to every piece in your portfolio – when you add them up would the
average land above 7? Maybe above 8? If not, dump the crap. This goes for any
submissions you may make as well. Average is over, mediocre is done and typical
is out. Learn to be ruthless - if you are tentative about a piece, pull it.
Shoot for 10.
Very interesting. I like it! Thanks for posting this, Jim.
ReplyDeleteGreat insight - thanks for the tip
ReplyDeleteLove your blog. :) I agree with everything you've written. In another life, I was an advertising/marketing vp and I made a lot of creative presentations. I was never a believer in showing ten concepts--I'd go with one. And I'd get big flack for it from the powers that be, but if I believe in an ad campaign I didn't want to dilute it with anything else. Of course art and art licensing is a different ballgame, but the concept is similar. Although I am now the artist and not on the sales end, I still look at licensing through a sales lens--I've now been on both sides of the equation:) Great blog and enjoy reading :). ---Mindy Sommers
ReplyDeleteWise tip - I just did exactly that a few days ago JIm, I just reviewed my whole portfolio and eliminated the crapy design, kept the good ones and marked some worth saving to be improved. Great exercise!
ReplyDeleteWow, that just gelled something in me that I think I suspected but never really "got." Thank you! I am going to go rearrange my portfolio right now. :)
ReplyDeleteOk, I need to re-evaluate what I have up on my website. Sage advice. Thank you.
ReplyDelete